I prefer long-term principles over short-term convenience and see the negative consequences of dependence upon a big global corporation (Yes, I'm against steamDRM for the same reason). Since I oppose the inclusion of googles widespread injection into everything, that doesn't bother me (Simply using µMatrix will show you googles presence almost everywhere). Those sites are of course infected by google in one way or another. I use Pale Moon 99% of the time as my main browser, and only have some slight issues with a few sites. I've since come to understand the importance of privacy, customization and principles. I suspect that someone running the 32-bit version of the browser on a 32-bit version of Windows would find it even slower than I did.I first started using Pale Moon because I heavily disliked the UI change in Firefox. For comparison, I downloaded a 32-bit version as well, and noticed it looked identical, but was a tad slower. If you have a 64-bit version of Windows 7, there is a version of Pale Moon tailored for it, and that’s the one I’m running. Pale Moon runs very well on Windows 7, but I could not get it to run on my backup Vista machine, although documentation on the browser’s Web site says it is supposed to run on Windows versions as far back as XP.
If your PC has an AMD processor you’ll have to download a separate version. Indeed, it won’t run on older PCs, or on computers running Linux or other operating systems. Unlike Firefox and other popular browsers, Pale Moon was designed with Windows and new generations of Intel processors in mind. (Version 9.0.1 of Pale Moon was released Monday, you can download it and read more about it here.) Pale Moon is faster than Firefox, uses less memory and is compatible with many - but far from all - extensions and add-ons that are a big part of Firefox’s personality. I keep a close eye on the browser world, but I have to admit that I’ve never noticed Pale Moon, an offshoot of Mozilla’s popular Firefox.īut now that I’ve tried the latest version, I’m happy to recommend it.
0 kommentar(er)
